Trump is winning

The right wingers on here are so ludicrous. Its funny. Its like a stereotype caricature on a comic strip. Just put them on ignore because I got fed up of constant streams of edgy teenager uneducated alt right trump shite.

Golly gosh, these guys. The ones who constantly bitch about welfare but would be begging the government for money if things went downhill.
 
Kinda like the anti-health-care-social-system protesters that start GoFundMe campaigns to pay for medical bills ...
I guess when you're life is on the line due to a heart attack, cancer or what ever, things like ideology become kinda secondary.
 
It's kinda terrible that a bot is not distinguishable from actual leftists. The Turing test would be so much easier to beat if everyone was that retarded.
 
Hassknecht said:
It's kinda terrible that a bot is not distinguishable from actual leftists. The Turing test would be so much easier to beat if everyone was that retarded.
Click to expand...

Man leftists just don't engage on the internet because rightists are notorious for never changing their opinions and just mocking the left regardless of what they say or believe. It's real easy for you to call people with a different ideological framework then yours stupid though, yeah?

And they looove spreading it all over unrelated Internet message boards.
Click to expand...

Hypocrite.
 
The left wingers on here are so ludicrous. Its funny. They have to resort to "oh yea well if things were one way I know exactly how'd think and act because I say so!" for "arguments". I wish I could be an omnipotent mind reader too :(

Also @Doomsdayprepper lol is this bait or are you really bi-polar?
 
Vergil said:
The left wingers on here are so ludicrous. Its funny. They have to resort to "oh yea well if things were one way I know exactly how'd think and act because I say so!" for "arguments". I wish I could be an omnipotent mind reader too :(

Also @Doomsdayprepper lol is this bait or are you really bi-polar?
Click to expand...

Maybe it's because you think "McCarthy Was Right" is a thing worth saying, man. You still haven't cited any sources on that.

"I mentioned awhile back some remarks by anti-Semites, all of them absurd: "I hate Jews because they make servants insubordinate, because a Jewish furrier robbed me, etc." Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past. It is not that they are afraid of being convinced. They fear only to appear ridiculous or to prejudice by their embarrassment their hope of winning over some third person to their side." --Jean-Paul Sartre
 
Last edited:
aenemic said:
For a guy who comes across as pretty smart and educated, that was a pretty ignorant statement.
Click to expand...
While it's certainly true that a lot of people just love ganging up on tweets they don't like on the Internet, I think it should be a warning sign that a bot can be mistaken for an actual person, because it shows that a movement is approaching that critical mass of idiots that Poe's Law will become an issue.
For example, recently the Left party in Germany proposed a law or something in a local government that the names of office appliances should be properly gender-mainstreamed (due to the way the german language works things like "bin" or "pencil" or "eraser" use the masculine genus, and people appear to be unable to differ between genus and sexus). From any other party (except Green) this would have been easily spotted as a joke, but not them, because people started to expect this kind of stuff from them. Now there are a lot of jokes that simply fly over the heads of wingnuts, like "Antifa e.V." (official antifa organisation, which to anyone with even the smallest amount of knowledge should be obvious as a joke), but since there's so much confusion and disinformation going around it's borderline impossible to tell the bullshit apart from the serious stuff.
So yeah, any movement that can be replaced by a shitposting bot without it being obvious should maybe take a good look at how its followers usually behave.

Garbagecrone said:
Man leftists just don't engage on the internet because rightists are notorious for never changing their opinions and just mocking the left regardless of what they say or believe. It's real easy for you to call people with a different ideological framework then yours stupid though, yeah?
Click to expand...
I actually share large quantities of their ideological framework. But the debate culture on the Internet is fucked up, and it's not just the fault of the wingnuts, the moonbats did their own fair share of running shit into the ground. I'm tired of that whole high horse bullshit of not even trying to come up with arguments just because one is so sure that he's right. That kind of behaviour is why such a bot can fool them to begin with.
Garbagecrone said:
Hypocrite.
Click to expand...
That's related in what way now?
 
Garbagecrone said:
Maybe it's because you think "McCarthy Was Right" is a thing worth saying, man. You still haven't cited any sources on that.

"I mentioned awhile back some remarks by anti-Semites, all of them absurd: "I hate Jews because they make servants insubordinate, because a Jewish furrier robbed me, etc." Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past. It is not that they are afraid of being convinced. They fear only to appear ridiculous or to prejudice by their embarrassment their hope of winning over some third person to their side." --Jean-Paul Sartre
Click to expand...
So based on that quote you guys are just running with the "he was 100% serious despite him already saying he was joking yay now I can just use ad hominem now" strategy? Looks like no matter what the level liberals always resort to the same desperate tactics. Also posting a "wow really makes you think ;^)" quote isnt an argument either.
 
Hassknecht said:
I actually share large quantities of their ideological framework. But the debate culture on the Internet is fucked up, and it's not just the fault of the wingnuts, the moonbats did their own fair share of running shit into the ground. I'm tired of that whole high horse bullshit of not even trying to come up with arguments just because one is so sure that he's right. That kind of behaviour is why such a bot can fool them to begin with.
Click to expand...

"Wingnuts" "Moonbats" oh my god are we talking about the same material reality here what does that mean outside of "People I Disagree With". And a lot of the people arguing with bots on Twitter (??? I can't believe I'm mentioning these idiots as a group! Why would you argue with anyone for 10 hours on Twitter?) are just as unlikely to change their minds in an argument, online or otherwise. "Internet debate culture" affects a lot more outside of it at this point than you'd think. Maybe that's just in the US tho.

What parts of the ideological framework of the Left do you share? You a fan of Marx or Trotsky? Or do you prefer more modern stuff like Baedan or the body of feminist work from the 60s to the 90s? You don't seem to be a big fan of people trying to upend class relations in any way from what I've seen on here so... I'm just a little confused.

Hassknecht said:
That's related in what way now?
Click to expand...

I'm just sayin', why make fun of people for something you're just as bad about? Glass houses, dude.

Vergil said:
So based on that quote you guys are just running with the "he was 100% serious despite him already saying he was joking yay now I can just use ad hominem now" strategy? Looks like no matter what the level liberals always resort to the samd desperate tactics.
Click to expand...

Anti-semite here means nazi and do people really need to reread the last 10 pages to see your fascist ideas?

>Me, liberal

emoji-head-guy.jpg
 
I love the arguing of whos Liberal, whos left, whos right, blah blah blah. This shit is getting funny, kinda like the US election.

Also Left and right are so bad at identifying a person's political affiliation. I prefer the quadrent method with an up down axis too. Look it up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top