There's a word I haven't heard in a long time. People still say neo-liberal?
So that we both know what we're talking about. Sweden is not a purely socialist state and the US is not purely capitalistic. But when you put both nations on a scale, Sweden and Germany are definetly closer to socialism or the 'idea' of it, compared to the US, otherwise some wouldn't' call those states "nanny-states". But strange enough Germany is one of those that suffers very few security issues and Sweden is one of those nations with the happiest citizens. Again, compared to the US. Many nations that dealt one way or another with military interventions and conflicts, suffered heavily from terrorism. And not just the US. France, Britain, Russia and many more. In that sense Germany historically speaking, also luckily never dealt to much in colonialism. Many people in Africa and Asia, have still strong feelings regarding Britain and France.
So if you don't give a shit about how other people live their lives, you're a hypocrite for being against murder? How is not wanting to pay for someone else's mistake blaming children?
How did we come to this point again? We started to talk about affordable high quality education, for all people, regardless if they are rich or poor. And I don't think this is unreasonable.
You can see education like a resource in some case, good and affordable education is an investment into the future. If you want to make sure that a nation maintains a certain amount of progress and development then you need creative minds and places from where you can obtain it and you have to provide those people with the challanges and interesting oportunities to put their skill to use. Having a lot of physicists, if they end up working outside, because there is no real research going, isn't very effective. And not offering young minds the chance to actually get an affordable education in the field they are very interested in, is even worse.
If you can't afford education, then secrew you! Might sound nice on paper from a capitalist/neo-liberal point of view - or what ever you want to call it - but at the end of day, it means that you lower youre pool when it comes to academics and highly skilled people. People that will come up trough their ingenuity and education with solutions to possible future problems. Be it as scientists or engineers. The US is already loosing in many areas here, simply because there is less education and less oportunities to actually put that in use. ITER and CERN are mainly European projects these days.
It can't be stressed enough, how important high quality and affordable education is for nations in our time.
I wasn't talking about Iraq, just explaining that it's perfectly natural for us to give less of a shit for people dying elsewhere than in our own civilizational sphere.
Yeah, and those same people run around and fly planes into buildings. The kind of people we don't give a shit about. The world isn't like the 18th century anymore. People are conected. They can get informations in a very short amount of time. We can hate people like Bin Laden or Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, and they probably deserve everything that is coming at them. But you can not denny the fact that they have a huge appeal on all of those people, that saw some 'damage' from this "(...)it's perfectly natural for us to give less of a shit for people dying elsewhere than in our own civilizational sphere". People don't wake up one day with the decision to strap a bomb around their weist or drive a car full of explosives in to a crowd of people they never meet in their live. Extremism, is not something people are born with. If weo don't keep those things in mind, we will always run in to the same issues over and over again.