That would literally put us into even more debt, what you said about the United States being big is true, but in a sense of having the largest population, so giving away free healthcare is not practical in our situation at all. 318 million people guaranteed free healthcare is not the same as 9 million or 5 million people promised free healthcare.
So when it comes to a small Muslim minority [relative to the christian population in the US] entering the nation you can do it like Poland or Hungary, but eventually for billions of dollars.
But when it comes to health care and helping your own citizens, fuck them, it's to expensive, you don't have the money.
Is that right so far?
Hey
@Crni Vuk I heard bulletproof vests are pretty good at protecting you from bullets. Wait, what's that? It turns out that bad guys can still shoot you in the head and limbs. Throw the vests away then, who needs em! Its not like risk mitigation is in anyway worthwhile.
Crossife used apples and oranges.
...
It was not very effective
Could you make it anymore obivious that you get all of your beliefs told to you by this youtube channel?
As obvious as you coming from Breitbart. How big is their sallary by the way? Let me guess, you're working as a volunteer.
Ad hominem attacks, a classic Vergil, as always. I once used Kurzgesagt in this topic regarding terrorism, beacuse their arguments sound reasonable, and of course in Vergils world, I only get my news from them.
Just continue calling me a retard, at least that's honest.
I'm talking about islamic terrorism not the very idea of terrorism itself.
Also funny you mention israel, who is a successful example of using a wall...
If your dream state and plan for the future is to make the US into soemthing like Israel and the middle east ... then sure. Go ahead. However, Israel is still suffering from attacks. And building a wall around Mexico, is one thing, completely shutting down the US, is a whole different issue.
The question still remains, how do you effectively stop the 'spread' of islamic terrorism? How do you effectively fight ideologies in the first place? By throwing every muslim out? Or only those that are crazy? How do you seperate the crazy ones from the 'moderate' muslims? See, those are important questions, because you can't just fight ideologies with a 'don't let them in!'.
Almost nothing that was done since 9/11, and it was a lot, has effectively improved the situation for the US or the middle east. This should give us at least the idea, that more measures, might eventually be the wrong way, which doesn't mean that you should do NOTHING AT ALL(!), of COURSE, you should look for dangerous people. But simply because there is the KKK, you don't start to assume that every white, christian male is a potential right wing terrorist.
It still baffles me, how someone who has so little respect and actuall faith in the US government, completely and TOTALLY trusts them in such a delicate matter like terrorism, surveillance and checkups. Does nothing that you've seen and read about the NSA and CIA over the last 30-40 years concern you in the slightest?