who did you side with on your first playthrough

actualy I killed House cause he was arogant. If I am thinking about that was the main reason I also killed most of the centurions from the legion I came across. :mrgreen:
 
I sided with Dr. House. Because of all the factions he was the one side that could bring a better future for humanity.

- He had the knowledge to do so. Both the technical knowledge and the business knowledge.

- He has the interest of bringing New Vegas to its former glory. And even build rockets.

- He had no interest on conquering other lands. Nor imposing a system on the other towns.

Sure, he is an arrogant megalomaniac. But one with a vision.

The Legion was too evil for my taste, and would fall out anyway once Caesar was death.

The NCR was just the same crap as todays government. The illusion of democracy where there is none. And a sense of annexing anything they want without regard if people like it or not.

And YesMan was too dangerous. He could evolve into a Sky-net later on.

So overall of all the evils. House seemed like the least one.
 
rxantos said:
I sided with Dr. House. Because of all the factions he was the one side that could bring a better future for humanity.

- He had the knowledge to do so. Both the technical knowledge and the business knowledge.

- He has the interest of bringing New Vegas to its former glory. And even build rockets.

- He had no interest on conquering other lands. Nor imposing a system on the other towns.

Sure, he is an arrogant megalomaniac. But one with a vision.

The Legion was too evil for my taste, and would fall out anyway once Caesar was death.

The NCR was just the same crap as todays government. The illusion of democracy where there is none. And a sense of annexing anything they want without regard if people like it or not.

And YesMan was too dangerous. He could evolve into a Sky-net later on.

So overall of all the evils. House seemed like the least one.

So, basically, House is an autocratic dictator using an army of robots to rule over the tribals he allows to live (remember Freetown? Yeah, those were people on House's bad side.) and doesn't care about the bloodshed and anarchy outside his city-state's borders, of which there is quite a lot.

Basically, House's problem is the Brotherhood of Steel's problem: Not enough influence or manpower to impose a "better" world, and thus doomed to lose relevance in the face of larger powers.
 
I agree with rxantos. I feel the same way.

- Caesar is barbarism - definitely out.

- NCR is same old thing we have now. Another democracy illusion with corruption and moral dissolution running rampant. May as well turn into another enclave or bomb the enemies with nuclear weaponry once it acquires the tech. Definitively a no-no.

- House may not have the manpower and influence, but that doesn't change the fact he's the only side that offers something new. Something that can work, instead of another rome or another pre-war US. Rome and Pre-war US failed miserably both and giving them another try is a waste of time to me.
 
When i first started playing i was going to side with the Legion, on account of being a Latin student, but when i met the Yes Man i was like, "Wait! I can take over Vegas?" so I sided with him...[spoiler:68df6390fb]after i blew up the securitron army...[/spoiler:68df6390fb]
 
- House may not have the manpower and influence, but that doesn't change the fact he's the only side that offers something new. Something that can work, instead of another rome or another pre-war US. Rome and Pre-war US failed miserably both and giving them another try is a waste of time to me.

He offers "something new", and yet he reconditions tribals to rebuild the pre-War Vegas and to emulate pre-War Vegas gangs.
 
Diomedes20 said:
When i first started playing i was going to side with the Legion, on account of being a Latin student, but when i met the Yes Man i was like, "Wait! I can take over Vegas?" so I sided with him...[spoiler:dfc626a257]after i blew up the securitron army...[/spoiler:dfc626a257]
:facepalm:
 
I sided with Yes Man, simply because he was voiced by Dave Foley (Kids in the Hall!) and I got a kick out of his slavish-yet-sarcastic delivery. I think Foley's Yes-Man is my new favorite fallout character, topping everyone from FO 1,2. Fallout 3 barely had characters.

My second favorite fallout character, also new, is Cass, just for her sneak-commentary:

"Shhhhhh, we're hunting ****heads!"

Plus, the independent thing: I mean, it's the Wasteland, who do you trust more than yours truly to do the job right anyway? A possible AI/autocrat, a dictator or a rudderless, corrupt republic?

I vote for me. Unless we are talking about vault 11, in which case, I vote for you.
 
I stopped playing. There were simply so many retarded bugs that I couldn't continue. I'll let them fix it first.
 
Thomas de Aynesworth said:
I sided with the Legion. I admire them.

HAH! Finally! Someone who thinks like me! I admire them too. Vulpes Inculta is so badass. And Legate Lanius... damn, can't find words for his badassness.

That's what I wrote in another thread:

I am so fascinated with his "Pax Romana" speech; explaining his ideology, his reasons for doing what he does, his intentions. And he is absolutely right about it all. I really think Caesar is the last, best hope for humanity.

The NCR, this corrupt obstacle, reflecting pre-Great War governments, and Mr. House, this depraved individual, are the real evil factions. Prostitution, gambling, gluttony, venality, greed, envy, all this evil upholded by them that lead to the Great War in the first place. If the NCR or Mr. House have their way, there will be another nuclear war in a few decades. They represent all that is wrong with humanity (and all that was wrong before the Great War).

Vulpes Inculta is correct about Nipton. The mayor sold his own people, the NCR, the Powder Gangers and his integrity for caps (GREED). Typical pre-Great War human behaviour that must be extirpated. Nipton mayor = NCR = Mr. House.

Of course, the treatment of women in Caesar's Legion is despicable. That can be changed, though. The innate decadence and depravery of the NCR, Mr. House and the likes cannot...

PS: It is no coincidence that Caesar was with the Follower's of the Apocalypse. He was a humanist from the beginning, and still is, more than ever now that he is Caesar.
 
Thomas de Aynesworth said:
The synthesis between the Legion and the NCR that Caesar speaks of would be really, really interesting I think.

Right! I thought about that too.

You know, I have a friend who also plays New Vegas, and he absolutely hates the Legion. He thinks they are fascist (he's total left-wing in real life anyway). And I believe he is right. And even though that might be the case, the Legion is by far the best chance humanity has.

What did the Great War show us? It showed us the evil, the total depravity of Democracies and their citizens that lead to the Great War. The whole world was a wallow of corrupt, evil, greedy nations.

So yes, a synthesis of the NCR and the fascist Legion would be very interesting.
 
You don't need a global thermo-nuclear war to see how totally depraved and evil Western democracies are. I see your point, though.

Caesar wanted to build a civilization that would rival both the corrupt and broken democracies of the past (notice how even the NCR uses "democracy" when allegedly it is a republic?) and the imperial dictatorship of ancient Rome. His comparison of himself to Iulius Caesar and the Colorado to the Rubicon is an oversimplification.

Most likely the end result would be a fascist state, similar in fashion to Mussolini's Italy or even the National Legionary State of Greater Romania.

Maybe a proto-fascist state like the Russian Federation, but I doubt it, given the strong ethos instilled in the members of Caesar's Legion.
 
Thomas de Aynesworth said:
(notice how even the NCR uses "democracy" when allegedly it is a republic?)
And, uh, one makes the other impossible?
A state can be a republic, but not a democracy, it can be a democracy without being a republic and it can be both.
Anyway, the problem with the Legion is that they are portrayed as completely evil and not really as a "grey" choice.
 
Hassknecht said:
And, uh, one makes the other impossible?
Pretty much. Do you live in the USA? It is not a republic.

A true republic is not and cannot be a democracy. Democracies are insane.

Rational people should shudder at the idea of a democracy. Nothing gets done, people get stomped on in a creepy, Huxleyesque fashion, even worse, people in democracies hold themselves accountable when the system inevitably fucks up. At least in a republic like Rome, every single mistake and screw-up can be blamed on a certain individual.
 
Diomedes20 said:
When i first started playing i was going to side with the Legion, on account of being a Latin student, but when i met the Yes Man i was like, "Wait! I can take over Vegas?" so I sided with him...[spoiler:91f6588b33]after i blew up the securitron army...[/spoiler:91f6588b33]

LOL that's exactly what I did.
 
You do realize that when people say "democracy" they mean representative democracy, and not pure democracy, which is simply not feasible on a state level?
 
Thomas de Aynesworth said:
You don't need a global thermo-nuclear war to see how totally depraved and evil Western democracies are.

Of course not! I bet that our real life democracies are already more depraved and evil, than the pre-Great War nations were in 2077...
 
Ausir said:
You do realize that when people say "democracy" they mean representative democracy, and not pure democracy, which is simply not feasible on a state level?
Of course not, where did you get that from?
Lanius said:
Of course not! I bet that our real life democracies are already more depraved and evil, than the pre-Great War nations were in 2077...
By Mars, somebody gets me. Haha.
 
Back
Top