Hey folks, lets chill a bit here. I mean, whether you are gay or not, whether you recognize it or not, that's ok. Everyone gets to make gender choices. Everyone gets to choose who they bone.
Some of you folks are repressed homosexuals. I have friends who are repressed, "in the closet" gay. Dudes, that sucks. Get out of the closet and be true to yourselves.
Just, as a gay friend told me, don't be a bottom. There is no pride in it.
What I offer here is a hypothesis, a causal explanation for Dammitboy's correlation. Is true? That's the question-
The question is simply- why do women prefer men without beards. Why do gay mean prefer men with beards.
But even if I were gay and could speak on this, I couldn't generalize for the overall population. I can speak to gay friends and ask and they would give us different answers.
How does one get an answer? Deduction and a bit of Occam's Razor tells us that the simple answer is probably right.
So the theory. We are classifying people based on their gender preferences.
I posit-
(1) The difference between gender preference depends fundamentally on one's preference for oral sex.
Thus the division of straight and gay is determined by a variant on "you are what you eat." Its simple operationalization of a variable.
(2) Do we have a logical explanation that holds up consistently.
Ok, we can understand a straight woman prefers a shaved man because it avoids rash on their inner thighs and an irritated clit.
Exception 1- We can also draw an exception, a man with a well kept beard, a soft beard, is likely to actually get improved boning by virtue of their attention to detail and willingness to be a sensitive lover (see Suaside above).
Based on my own experience on this, I think its true. When my beard was itchy and scratchy, my girlfriends (and I am leaving my wife out of this because that would be really uncool) would complain.
Ok, confession. I like to go down on a chick. I could get down and stay down there for a long time.
But when you're bearded the girl complains. When the beard doesn't exist, its better. When its well manicured.. honestly, my results are mixed, so I will look to Suaside for confirming evidence.
Why is the "well tailored beard" thesis an exception. Again, based on personal experience, most guys are too fucking lazy to make the effort and most don't feel they have too.
How does this account for history of beards?
I argue cultural and political-economic changes allow women greater freedom of choice as sexual repression is removed.
Do all women hate beards- no. But some women are turned on by different things than other. That doesn't discount Dammitboy's correlation.
Ok, so why do gay guys like beards.
Let think about the gay culture.
(1) There is a strand of ultra-masculine, a reverance for things male/macho - chuck norris, Mr. T
(2) Gays eat cock.
But the question might be, given oral, don't men also get that irritation.
Answer, probably not.
Note that those of you who have given head to a woman know that a woman will often wrap their thighs around your head. This can be a vice like grip, and if you are going down on an especially fat woman, can lead to asphixiation. Alternatively, on a very strong woman, it can put you in traction.
That said, when a girl goes down on a guy, there's a lot of head bobbing and perhaps manual manipulation of your schlonge with her hand. In short, the physical act is distinctive and contact by the woman with the man's thighs is limited.
I would imagine, and I haven't asked this question as its a bit too personal, that the act of getting blown by a guy is similar to getting blown by girl, with the exception being that if he has a beard, it might tickle your balls.
That said, an advantage of having a beard is that it consumes very consumables that tend to fall out of your mouth as you eat.
My experience eating pussy with a beard left me with the rather pleasant smell of pussy on beard in the aftermath. Might this be true of gay man with beards? Does some sperm leak onto the beard. Does the gay man's beard smell of sweaty balls? Perhaps.
Does this make logical sense? I think so.
Am I going to test this theory? Fuck no.