Canada’s top court rules non-penetrative sex with animals is legal

You are assuming all rapists are into bestiality, also if they cared about legality they wouldn't rape in the first place...
 
Walpknut said:
You are assuming all rapists are into bestiality, also if they cared about legality they wouldn't rape in the first place...
Click to expand...

It's pretty easy to figure out who raped someone nowadays thanks to all our forensics tech. This is especially true here in the US and in Canada. These people rape women because they don't have an alternative. Not that this excuses them in any way, shape, or form, but I'd like to think if these sickos have the ability to screw a vagina, even if it's not a woman's, and with no legal repercussions, they'll take it. It's not a matter of if they like it or not, it's a matter of finding a new way to appeal to their disgusting tendencies.
 
Doomsdayprepper said:
Click to expand...

For someone who gets so assblasted when someone makes "unnecessary posts" in their threads you sure do love shitting up threads by posting the same shit over and over again about how much you "don't care" and "can't be fucked to keep debating someone". If you don't care so much have you considered, NOT posting?
 
Rape isn't even about getting laid most times, and there are also prostitutes and escorts if someone is that desperate, most times is a power fantasy, Rapists don't really care aboout legality either so legalizing animal blowjobs isn't gonna magically make them go "Oh Gee Whizz, Now I have a legal alternative!", this law only benefits people who were already fucking animals, a group which I am guessing many of the legislators who aproved it are part of...
 
R.Graves said:
Wasn't her name Whitney wisconsin?Hate to prove the other guys point but:
Click to expand...


I think you should post this in the bizzare video thread. I'm not thumbing it up here only because that might seem like i'm an enthusiast for this kind of thing :D.
 
Walpknut said:
Rape isn't even about getting laid most times, and there are also prostitutes and escorts if someone is that desperate, most times is a power fantasy, Rapists don't really care aboout legality either so legalizing animal blowjobs isn't gonna magically make them go "Oh Gee Whizz, Now I have a legal alternative!", this law only benefits people who were already fucking animals, a group which I am guessing many of the legislators who aproved it are part of...
Click to expand...

Well, that's a fair point. But now I'm left once again with the question of "why?". I thought at first this was done as a way to curb rapists, considering, like I said, Canada does have the highest rape count of any first world country. But since that's clearly not the case as you've shown me, why in the Hell would they pass this law?
 
Ragemage said:
Well, that's a fair point. But now I'm left once again with the question of "why?". I thought at first this was done as a way to curb rapists, considering, like I said, Canada does have the highest rape count of any first world country. But since that's clearly not the case as you've shown me, why in the Hell would they pass this law?
Click to expand...
Where does this info on Canada having the highest rape count come from?

As far as I know, Sweden and the USA have the most rape per capita in the first world.
 
Illuminati Confirmed! said:
Where does this info on Canada having the highest rape count come from?

As far as I know, Sweden and the USA have the most rape per capita in the first world.
Click to expand...

Well I read about it a few years ago, but it looks like it's dropped to number 8 by now. Still, Canada has a very high rape count, and it's on many top 10 spots involving rape statistics. It's definitely higher than the US. On almost every list the US isn't even included in the top 10, but Canada always is. You're right about Sweden though, Sweden is also prominent on many of these lists.

Here's an example: http://katehon.com/389-top-10-countries-with-highest-rape-crime.html
 
Ragemage said:
It's pretty easy to figure out who raped someone nowadays thanks to all our forensics tech. This is especially true here in the US and in Canada. These people rape women because they don't have an alternative. Not that this excuses them in any way, shape, or form, but I'd like to think if these sickos have the ability to screw a vagina, even if it's not a woman's, and with no legal repercussions, they'll take it. It's not a matter of if they like it or not, it's a matter of finding a new way to appeal to their disgusting tendencies.
Click to expand...
Source please? I have a hard time to believe any of what you said. From where do you get this idea that people rape more, because they can't screw animals?
 
Crni Vuk said:
Source please? I have a hard time to believe any of what you said. From where do you get this idea that people rape more, because they can't screw animals?
Click to expand...

I never said people rape more BECAUSE they can't screw animals. I said people rape women because there's no alternative. We've never had any way to legally rape something until this bestiality law. There's no source because it's simply an idea. Read again what I wrote, I think you may have misunderstood what I was trying to say. I thought it's what Canada's government was trying to do, in order to curb the rape of women, but @Walpknut already explained why that can't be. So now I'm just left with questions instead of answers as to why they'd let this law pass.
 
For someone who gets so assblasted when someone makes "unnecessary posts" in their threads you sure do love shitting up threads by posting the same shit over and over again about how much you "don't care" and "can't be fucked to keep debating someone". If you don't care so much have you considered, NOT posting?
Click to expand...
nobody cares, apart from you, and your other eugenics buddy. I love how you both defend each other in threads, its cute, if annoying.
 
Ragemage said:
So now I'm just left with questions instead of answers as to why they'd let this law pass.
Click to expand...
From the wording of the article it sounds as though it's more a problem of semantics than anything else. In law you obviously need to have very strict definitions in order to prosecute someone and this time around they decided coaxing an animal into licking an underage girl's vagina wasn't animal abuse. I'd be fine with that as long as they charged the asshole with something else for that, but they didn't, because they're retarded.
 
Canada’s top court rules non-penetrative sex with animals is legal
Click to expand...
5ba98f45083b1fa1f0e4ac8d7baa810d.jpg
 
2C8C1B4400000578-3242504-A_distinguished_Oxford_contemporary_claims_Cameron_once_took_par-m-25_1442785115159.jpg

david-and-the-pig.jpg

davidcameron_pigsemen.jpg
I am actually surprised it took so long for someone to mention him in a bestiality thread
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top