So your solution to the problem is that nobody anywhere should be able to own a gun? And because of another country's problem they should have anti-gun laws forced upon them by the EU even if it's not what they want? France has some of the strictest gun laws in the world and yet it's still having these shootings. Are you really arguing on the side that closing the border and deportation isn't a reasonable solution but going around and grabbing the few countries who let their citizens defend themselves' guns during a hot period of terrorism is? But France certainly seems like a Civil Warzone. And the rest of Europe isn't seeming all that better with all these attacks. Why shouldn't people be allowed to protect themselves on the chance that theres a terrorist attack? I mean after a string of these attacks wouldn't you say it's not totally unreasonable for people to want to have some form of protection that's more useful than a slightly rusted butter knife in some countries?