Heh.
I'm sure all those teams are home crying in their hankeys that they were locked into their play-off spot before and are now still locked into exactly the same position.
There were about 4 games going this weekend in which people were still playing for something, Pats-Giants amusingly one of 'em. You could tell when there was and you could tell when there wasn't something to play for, as is always the case come week 17. If you want to believe the Titans would've beat the Colts with a play-off spot in the line, or the Falcons the Seahawks or the Texans the Jags, go ahead. If you're naive enough to still believe there's no difference for these professionals for trying for play-off spots, playing in contract years and that kind of stuff and want to believe a significant part of them are still playing for love of the game...
Sure you can pretend it doesn't matter, or that whether or not you play your starters is the only factor of significance. If that's what you want to pretend, go ahead, no skin of my back.
PS: yeah, the Boys have been weak for a month running, they're a different case. Not sure why you're gloating about that, but it is what it is.
Amusingly enough, with the Boys being like this, nobody can stop the Pack's superbowl run except...
...
...the Seahawks!
Shti!
And based on that, the wins I mentioned were upsets.
How do you define "upset"? Because a lot of those wins were predicted, the spread favoured the Titans, the Falcons, the Texans, etc.
According to the bookies, the only upsets were: Bears over Saints, Broncos over Vikes, Ravens over Steelers. The rest were predictable and, hey, predicted.