This all sounds so much like brainfuck. Is it so cool to be in a sect? Maybe I should found my own?
Brother None said:I find it interesting how little people who jump at the chance to condemn Scientology have any interest in learning more about it when faced with a Scientologist.
Fear of knowledge, much?
Brother None said:Fear of knowledge, much?
If you wish to point out any specific claim i will happily address it.
I find it interesting how little people who jump at the chance to condemn Scientology have any interest in learning more about it when faced with a Scientologist.
Fear of knowledge, much?
Like what? What other religion offers half of what Scientology does in terms of lifestyle improvement AND purification of the soul and mind?
No it isn't. May i ask how much you actually know of auditing? Many people hold a lot of silly ideas regarding it.
So? Fallout does not paint a very good picture of the Followers either or the Unity. These ideas can be compared to many other religions with far bigger reputations than my own. What has this got to do with anything?
We STRONGLY support the use of modern, 'western' medicine. It works. Drugs exist that DO help serious psychological issues. What we dislike is psychological analysis beyond that required for diagnosis of serious conditions. This happens all the time and is wrong, unproductive and damaging.
I do agree with you to an extent. As i have said, for me and MOST other Scientologists it is what you do that counts rather than what you read/believe.
The science in Scientology refers to the basic roots of the word. 'Study of knowing'. This can be applied to many different contexts, in the case of Scientology this is a largely spiritual one which has some practical ramifications.
Current research in genetics is starting to show their may be basic Scientifics reasons behind crime. Certainly detectable, perhaps even curable. If measures were designed based on this science it could be used to reduce crime levels. Would this be a good thing - yes. Would the policy be a good thing? Many, myself included would say no.
Do you believe you are dense and close-minded?
Paladin Solo said:How's that? He hasn't really said anything other than his religion is the bestest and they're implying there's a conspiracy against them.
Athiests have taken it upon themselves to control their own condition
Brother None said:I find it interesting how little people who jump at the chance to condemn Scientology have any interest in learning more about it when faced with a Scientologist.
Fear of knowledge, much?
Brother None said:Well, you haven't really asked him to clear up any notions you have about his religion, have you?
Neamos said:ravager came here to set us straight and end the discussion. yoshi, your beliefs are dumb. atheism is the best. you better... wait for it... DEAL WITH IT.
EDIT: \/ D00d, I was sarcastic and openly smug about it, I don't really mean it. Please answers my questions above, Yoshi.
Yes, actually I do believe that a fiction writer, or anyone who concocts a religion in this day and age, is either certifiably unstable, or a con artist (Jesus with glasses FTW!)
I, in all honesty, think that humanity, as a species, has used religion as a crutch to explain the unknown so that we no longer fear it, even if the explanation is false, or ignorant.
However we are coming to a stage of development that we should start looking at our faiths and seriously question their existence, do we need them to explain why the sun is in the sky anymore? Do we need them to explain how we got here? Do we need them to explain what we should do with our lives?
As for the gene therapy to remove hostile elements from someone, it would have to be implemented to modify the person after they commit a crime, innocent until proven guilty is still the law after all, otherwise we'd all be senseless sheep with no drive to do anything.
Study of knowing, try study of knowledge, it'll get you further than believing that you're the only one that can help a crash victim rather than the paramedics. (Re: Tom Cruise Video where he acts all nutty)
As for the charity work, I have never heard of CoS putting money into anything, don't you think they'd plaster it onto the walls and whatnot about their charitable work in order to try and repair their media appeal?
When they start funding Doctors without borders, then talk to me, but self-serving charities, don't make me laugh.
I wouldn't be learning the teachings of Jesus because you know what, I wouldn't listen to someone who proclaimed themselves as the son of god, I'd be calling the padded wagon!
Let me put it to you this way, the bible hates me because I'm a bastard child, the mormon Bible hates me because I refuse to procreate, I just think the Jehovan bible is crazy, the Koran I have no bloody clue about, Buddhism is a neat idea but I have yet to see anyone return again due to karma points, and CoS hate me because I question my surroundings and everything that is told to me.
Aliens coming to earth, killing off a large chunk of their civilization, and dumping their spirits into the Neanderthals?!?
Sounds like a 70-80's B movie!
So who's the hero of this storyline, who saves the spirits of these blokes, or the people whoever is less evil by the storyteller's perspective... oh I forgot, the writer himself, Hubbard.
I would seriously take two steps back and analyse everything you're being told by the CoS, rather than swallowing it up without thinking, and I mean don't just look it over as a Scientologist, if you can find an answer to why for every single item of faith including the donation amount, which sounds a hell of a lot like the old catholic church (I believe I made this parallel before...)
That's what I find most offensive about the lot, is that a religion that's name is derived from the word Science, the pursuit of true knowledge, quashing free speech and thought because it is or may be a dissenting opinion.
Isn't that what most people call *Ahem* personal responsibility?Are you as dense as you appear to be or just selective in your ability to read?
Seriously though, yes it is. Your asked questions about your life to make amends with troubled feelings or thoughts. But Scientology uses technology and other useless devices as ritual for subjective retrospection, other than hallucinogenic drugs, pilgrimage, meditation, confession, or jerking off.I have done. The conclusion i reached was 'Scientology'. I was then asked if it is not possible there is a better option, my answer was rhetorically 'like what?'. Why try to answer the same question twice?
You mean something like auditing? Well, you're in your own self-made version of the CoS if that's your attitude on the subject.It is very easy to simplify practices to the point where they sound devalued. You can describe auditing as 'getting asked questions' just as you can describe hallucinogenic drugs as 'seeing things that are not there', pilgrimage as 'travelling', mediation as 'deep thinking' etc. This does not devalue the practice for the actual people doing it though.
No, not really. You will find my view on this is almost identical to that of the Church's in general.
Number 1: You mean like the paper trails of criminal activities in the CoS?
No. I don't.
Number 2: Then why join or read apon the CoS in the first place if you are so wise?
Erm what?
It isn't doing a very good job then, since psychiatric medication does work where needed.
*Woosh* Right, let me approach this from another angle for you. The Roman Catholic Church accepts that HIV is a problem in Africa. It also accepts contraception works. Yet it disagrees with use of contraception. Same idea. Oh and before you say comparison to the RCC is far from positive remember that, as i have said Scientology accepts in some serious cases psychiatric medication is needed.
See, it's not really special.
In another age the same may be said of science.
OOOOooo Mystic spooky babble.
And a simple question than even Paladin Solo should be capable of answering.
Scientology is no diffrent, thus, not better and not worthy of attention. I don't need the same shit wrapped in diffrent paper. And after all, it's fucking retarded and doesn't try to answer basic question on human condition and existence. Just some shit about Xenu and previous lives. Please.
Yes it does. As i have said very little emphasis is placed on Xenu etc. It is just far easier for critics to discuss these things.
Scientology however attempts to quash free speech through copyright laws (as it is based on a legally fictional novel by Hubbard whom his estate holds the copyright for anything Scientology based.) I also believe that Scientology is detrimental to it's followers as far as their 'donations' that are required to advance through the CoS.
The use of copyright laws is to protect. Many 'split off' groups which are indeed cons have been established base on Dianetics. It is perfectly possible to be an active Scientologist and NOT PAY A PENNY.
Ok, i am going to have to leave it at that for the moment as i have food to eat. Thank you for all your questions and the open mindedness of most of those asking them. I will try my best to answer Ravager69, Jabu's and Mord_Siths point later.
Many people find the need for drugs and excessive consumption of alcohol, but those people have addictions.There is a big, big difference between 'how' and 'why'. If you replace the former with the latter in your questions, the answer is clearly 'yes' for me. The fact that such a large percentage of the worlds population is religious speaks volumes really. Some people may not find a need for it, but many do. Anyway this isn't really anything Scientology related just religion in general which is a topic we could discuss forever.