On that note, I don't think many guys ponder about the ethics of sex while banging a girl doggy-style.
Damn you Wooz. I'm going to think of nothing but that next time
On that note, I don't think many guys ponder about the ethics of sex while banging a girl doggy-style.
If you think about it is discriminatory seeing how man on man sex is one of the three possible combinations (I left out hermaphrodites and animals ). It is also sort of insulting seeing how they probably thought: 'Hell, we'll give 'em chicks making out and they'll turn a blind eye to any other defects'. Besides, if I remember correctly, in Fallout 2 you could get Davin in the sack if your Ch was high enough... so once again Fallout rules . Another reason for leaving man on man out might be the ensuing scandal... poisoning the minds of the immaculate players and all that...I don't really see how that's equivocal. Not including gay sex = racial discrimination? (The equal sign meaning "is equivalent to.")
See, I disagree. I don't think there was any ulterior motive to including the girl-on-alien-girl thing and excluding a similar man-on-man thing. I highly doubt any discussion of whether or not to include it even happened, or was even thought about. It certainly didn't cross my mind when this whole topic (that particular scene in Mass Effect) started until the whole "ZOMG this is so sexist and demeaning they should have included dude-on-alien-dude too then it would be okay" thing came up.Martinez said:It is also sort of insulting seeing how they probably thought: 'Hell, we'll give 'em chicks making out and they'll turn a blind eye to any other defects'.
Just because Fallout 2 did it doesn't mean developers are forevermore obligated to include something similar as well. Further, while the ability to "get with" Davin as a male character was amusing, I don't really feel it added anything significant to the game.Besides, if I remember correctly, in Fallout 2 you could get Davin in the sack if your Ch was high enough...
Of course not. But I would still find it incongruous if I observed you slapping women's asses and making lewd comments to the female patrons at a bar one night, then the next night you were on a podium calling out, say, a movie producer for demeaning women in his latest movie.Yes, and that point is pretty damned stupid because it's pretty weird to claim that my behaviour on the Order should determine my political or social views. What's next, what I say in a bar is something I can never contradict?
Kyuu said:See, I disagree. I don't think there was any ulterior motive to including the girl-on-alien-girl thing and excluding a similar man-on-man thing. I highly doubt any discussion of whether or not to include it even happened, or was even thought about.
Right. That's the only possible reason. Maybe subconsciously they're a little homophobic (like the majority of males I've met) or whatever, but I hardly think that qualifies for "chauvinist pig" status. I rather think how they treat women in real life is more relevant.Brother None said:And they didn't think of it because they're chauvinist pigs.
Per said:If I got this right, it's not that you go out to have sex with someone at random and hit an invisible wall if you try to have sex as a male. There is one specific NPC who's willing to have sex with the main character and she happens to be female and she happens to like females.
H.A.D.E.S. said:It's their game and they have spent millions of dollars for it, so they can do whatever they want with it imo. If you don't like it, don't buy it. It's simple as that.
Mass Effect doesn't really seem great , but I don't understand why this is such a big deal. BioWare decided that they will have lesbian, but not gay sex and it's their decision not ours. It's liberty.
No. Do I boycott RPGs because they are trying to be porn instead of RPGs? Yes.H.A.D.E.S. said:Do you boycot lesbian porn because they don't have gay sex?