Today in Romania

CCR isn't even a bachelor. Now shut up and let's talk about exploding penii instead.
 
Google said:
Results 1 - 10 of about 13,700 for exploding penis romania

:shock:

Dunno if this one has been posted before:

BUCHAREST, Romania - A elderly Romanian man mistook his penis for a chicken’s neck, cut it off and his dog rushed up and ate it, the state Rompres news agency said on Monday.

It said 67-year-old Constantin Mocanu, from a village near the southeastern town of Galati, rushed out into his yard in his underwear to kill a noisy chicken keeping him awake at night.

“I confused it with the chicken’s neck,” Mocanu, who was admitted to the emergency hospital in Galati, was quoted as saying. “I cut it ... and the dog rushed and ate it.”

(http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6173286/)
 
Like I'd waste my time on lowly non-history bachelors like you!
Why is everyone misquoting me today?

Considering both my parents have about 6 siblings, my 2 siblings would count as "stopped", yeah
Do you plan on having kids Kharn?


Uhm, dude, you can't have read the entire thing I linked to, because it's a fragment of a book, not an article Wink

Whoops. Interesting book though, by the sound of it. Not my kind of thing, history of history, outside of maybe some interest in how Byzantine history developed.


1. It deals with the imagery, science and pseudo-science of Slav history-making and ethnology
Dude, I'm the first person in the world to admit that there's a lot of psedoscience in socio-historical anthropology. I've argued with too many Turks as to pre-existing Turkik people in Azerbaijann before the Turkish migrations in the 9th Century, and that the Sumerians where Turkish, and even the Elamites for good measure.

Fuck, just look at Sun Language Theroy. There's plenty of that in Linguistic Anthropology too.


2. It is a Interdisciplinary study, socio-historical anthropological, it is interesting because you can see the influences of all those directly, though I guess it's archeological anthropology more than cultural.
Yup, one of the main reasons I want to get into Philosophy or Anthropology; both condense a huge veriatey of diffirent pedantic persuits into one massive pedantic feild.
 
Johnny Boy said:
Fuck, just look at Sun Language Theroy. There's plenty of that in Linguistic Anthropology too.

Again with the Theroy! Who is this mysterious man named Theroy?

I don't see what's so interesting about Byzantine hystory or historiography. It's all shit. They were either fucking themselves over, selling themselves or getting their asses kicked by everyone who they couldn't pay protection money to. And their historiography is overrated, erronous and full of flat out lies.

P.S. Post whore of the day award goes to me for my 900th post. Yay!
 
Monday 9th August 2004 / Ananova

Romanian selling his penis

A Romanian man says he is decided to sell his penis because he needs money more than anything including having sex.

The 33-year-old man from Rovinari, Gorj county, who never met his parents, claims he needs financial support to take care of his younger brothers.

He said he doesn't really need his penis but knows somebody who does.

Constantin Dugulan told Gazeta de Sud newspaper: "I saw on TV that a doctor cut a patient's penis by mistake and I thought that man might be interested to buy mine. I am not sure this operation is possible but if it is I am ready to give up my penis for a better life."

The man said he was about to sell one of his kidneys and also an eye a few years ago but his client changed his mind.


http://www.globalspot.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=strange;action=print;num=1092335401
 
El Chupacabra said:
Constantin Dugulan told Gazeta de Sud newspaper: "I saw on TV that a doctor cut a patient's penis by mistake and I thought that man might be interested to buy mine. I am not sure this operation is possible but if it is I am ready to give up my penis for a better life."
He saw on TV that someone cut someone's penis? What a shocker. I wonder which station that was. It couldn't have been Romanian, could it?
 
El Chupacabra said:
He said he doesn't really need his penis but knows somebody who does.

Constantin Dugulan told Gazeta de Sud newspaper: "I saw on TV that a doctor cut a patient's penis by mistake and I thought that man might be interested to buy mine. I am not sure this operation is possible but if it is I am ready to give up my penis for a better life."

Shit, I didn't know they publicized my operation. O man, now the whole world knows I don't have a penis.

The man didn't leave a phone number by chance, did he?
 
Jebus said:
Like I'd waste my time on lowly non-history bachelors like you!

Phuh!

Thankfully, the title "bachelor" still holds no real solidified meaning in most of Europe (try getting a job with just a bachelor degree), so I can still poke fun at you for just being a student

An arrogant one.

You probably didn't even make it suma cum laude
 
I didn't even made it at all, the first run.

We'll see how good I did in my re-examns tomorrow.


Still, I know every possible thing ever written better than you because I study history. FACT.
 
Wooh, missed your post, John.

John Uskglass said:
Do you plan on having kids Kharn?

I find it pure foolishness to plan ahead to a time when your personality is bound to be wildly different.

That said, I do expect to have children, planning or not.

Most Dutch people do, to <strike>delude</strike> <strike>dilute</strike> <strike>kill</strike> take away your misconception...especially immigrants, heh. We should go back to pillarization, AKA "have as many babies as possible 'cause we need to defeat our ENEMIES (i.e. the other pillars)"

John Uskglass said:
Dude, I'm the first person in the world to admit that there's a lot of psedoscience in socio-historical anthropology. I've argued with too many Turks as to pre-existing Turkik people in Azerbaijann before the Turkish migrations in the 9th Century, and that the Sumerians where Turkish, and even the Elamites for good measure.

Fuck, just look at Sun Language Theroy. There's plenty of that in Linguistic Anthropology too.

Linguistic Anthropology is one of the most horridly abused subjects of all time. Ranging from proving that the Riurik legend of Rus is false because there is no Scandinavian in the Russian language to concluding blacks are inferior because African languages are really dumb, it's one helluva an abused science

Linguistic Anthropology and Archeological Anthropology are both "subjugated" to cultural anthropology simply because they are too narrow as studies to really work as unbiased forms of study.

John Uskglass said:
Yup, one of the main reasons I want to get into Philosophy or Anthropology; both condense a huge veriatey of diffirent pedantic persuits into one massive pedantic feild.

What about International Politics?

Jebus said:
I didn't even made it at all, the first run.

*taunts*

Jebus said:
Still, I know every possible thing ever written better than you because I study history. FACT.

But...I study history too. At least, it's one of my subjects

Tell you what, I'll major in history to, but get a Master of Philosophy in History at Oxford suma cum laude rather than a Master of Arts in History at Boerenachterhoek or wherever you study. Then I'll taunt you for the rest of your natural life*

* this does mean that if your life is extended unnaturally, I'll stop tauning you
 
Jebus said:
Pffft, philosophy. That's were the schmucks who can't handle history end up.

...

Huh?

Dude, Master of Philosophy (MPhil) is a title, just like Master of Arts and Master of Science. MPhil means you an MA, except that it's a two-year Master and is superior to a normal master in every way conceivable.
 
Kharn said:
Thankfully, the title "bachelor" still holds no real solidified meaning in most of Europe (try getting a job with just a bachelor degree), so I can still poke fun at you for just being a student

An arrogant one.

You probably didn't even make it suma cum laude
Bullshit. A Bachelor is a lot more useful than a Bachelor of Arts or a Bachelor of Science. It'll get you a job much quicker because you have a lot more practical experience.
Master of Arts and Master of Science degrees aren't always more useful either, that depends entirely on the job you want.

Kharn said:
Dude, Master of Philosophy (MPhil) is a title, just like Master of Arts and Master of Science. MPhil means you an MA, except that it's a two-year Master and is superior to a normal master in every way conceivable.
Master of Philosophy is a seperate title? Heh, never knew that.
But hey, all Master of Science titles are two-year Masters as well. So I can laugh at the puny Belgishian.

Kharn said:
We should go back to pillarization, AKA "have as many babies as possible 'cause we need to defeat our ENEMIES (i.e. the other pillars)"
And "No, son, you're not going to get the bread there, he's one of the others.

Also, for the record, Summa Cum Laude is largely useless. In fact, good grades are useless. No-one looks at them anyway, they'll all look at the paper saying your title, and then look at extracirricular activities. And possibly at the time it took you to complete your study.
Suckers. :P
 
Kharn said:
Jebus said:
Pffft, philosophy. That's were the schmucks who can't handle history end up.

...

Huh?

Dude, Master of Philosophy (MPhil) is a title, just like Master of Arts and Master of Science. MPhil means you an MA, except that it's a two-year Master and is superior to a normal master in every way conceivable.

In that case, I'll strive to become a Doctor in history.

Then I can taunt you, you arrogant Hollandistanian.
 
Sander said:
Bullshit. A Bachelor is a lot more useful than a Bachelor of Arts or a Bachelor of Science. It'll get you a job much quicker because you have a lot more practical experience.
Master of Arts and Master of Science degrees aren't always more useful either, that depends entirely on the job you want.

1. What is this "bachelor" you speak of? I've never heard of a bachelor that wasn't a BA or a BS. Are you speaking of degrees from HBOs?

2. Bachelor is not a recognised diploma wherever it is new. Yes, quack about it as much as you want, but continental Europe is still adapting their old mindset to this new system, which essentially means that to the bosses, "bachelor" just means "doesn't have his master yet"

3. Really? Masters aren't useful for getting a job as a garbageman? I'd never have guessed

4-7. Filler space.

8. Cool number.

Sander said:
Also, for the record, Summa Cum Laude is largely useless. In fact, good grades are useless. No-one looks at them anyway, they'll all look at the paper saying your title, and then look at extracirricular activities. And possibly at the time it took you to complete your study.

Patently untrue, though it depends on what field you pursue afterwards.

If you wish to continue in the research field or academic field after your study, you better be damned sure a summa cum laude will get you somewhere

Example of my cum laude drs. of history brother, who has been published several times now and is working at the Historical Documentation Center in the VU.

Jebus said:
In that case, I'll strive to become a Doctor in history.

Then I can taunt you, you arrogant Hollandistanian.

I'll become a super-doctor summa cum superlaude ars gratia artis et cetero censeo carthaginem esse delendam et tu filii of History.
 
Back
Top