Why don't we have a communist society yet? I mean we could.

It's funny how such conversations always end up with limits when it comes to "free shit" for the poor. However there is almost no discussion (generally speaking) about where the limit is to wealth. Like at which point is enough simply enough? 1 Billion in wealth? or 10? Or 100? Or if one person owns as much like the rest of the world?

I find it tiresome that it it often ends up with "who's going to pay for it!". Like I said, someone at some point always used that as argument against social improvements and wealth distribution. Everything seems impossible till someone does it.

And throughout our long discourses, I have not disagreed with a slightly higher tax rate. But again, our biggest problem isn't so much the tax rate as corporations using loopholes to not pay them. I have also agreed those loopholes should be closed.

But yes Crni, I am not funding rehab centers if people do not go. UBS might work in cases of extreme emergencies, or like the 100 percent automation tou speak of. Unlike you, I do not believe weed boy (example from another discussion), should be coddled. I definitely do not agree that some should be made to work while others are entitled to not work and get free shit.

This must be like the 50th time I have said this.
 
I would go to search and type in weed boy and you might get the part.

Edit: I just searched and weedboy is in this early thread I think.
 
Most of what you write has the outward appearance and coherence of a standard NPC54364 right wing libertarian argument. However, when closely inspected and tested, what you write is mostly incoherent garbage.

You may take time to evaluate your life and choices, they may be afflicted by this.
 
@ResetRPG I can understand the hate for capitalism. But on the subject of capitalists only giving out aid for money... that’s kind of the point. The system (the economy) doesn’t function without stimulation in any situation, and this is DOUBLY true of capitalism.

I think the hatred (and correct me if I’m wrong) stems from the cutthroat nature and Darwinist aspects of the capitalist system. Which is fair enough, but I’d argue that as far as systems go, capitalism has proved quite enduring by playing to humanity’s most obvious emotion: greed. It’s a primal system, and whether that’s right morally is something for each to decide for themselves.

(Personally, I don’t give a fuck, because we’re all just shaved monkeys fighting over pieces of the ground, #MJK, and to pretend to be “better” than we are is delusional. That being said, I don’t begrudge you or anyone else for your socialist beliefs, frankly I think a multitude of cultures and beliefs is what makes this world cool, and is why one system [aka capitalism] may actually not work for every community.)

TL;dr, my views on humanity are as follows
upload_2020-6-28_22-26-41.gif
 
Your sloppy language requires me begrudgingly to advocate for the precursor of a legal synthesis precedent when you make such broad generalizations.

GOWRON IS NOT AMUSED. GOWRON IS ANGRY.
 
Disagreement does not equate to broad generalisations.

Why do I bother when you spent the entire time ranting about communist mormons.
 
WHY DO YOU BOTHER? WHY ARE YOU SO TRIGGERED?!

WHAT OTHER THINGS CAN YOU SAY TO DRAG OUT THIS OUTDATED TOPIC?!

ARE YOU GOING TO MAKE ANY CHANGES OR ARE YOU HERE TO STICK YOUR DICK IN THE CEILING FAN?! THEN WHY DO YOU COMPLAIN WHEN I EMBARK MYSELF THE SAME DISCOURSE?! BECAUSE YOU NEED AN ENEMY, PATHETIC HUMAN. GOWRON WILL GIVE YOU ENEMY.

 
@ResetRPG I can understand the hate for capitalism. But on the subject of capitalists only giving out aid for money... that’s kind of the point. The system (the economy) doesn’t function without stimulation in any situation, and this is DOUBLY true of capitalism.

I think the hatred (and correct me if I’m wrong) stems from the cutthroat nature and Darwinist aspects of the capitalist system. Which is fair enough, but I’d argue that as far as systems go, capitalism has proved quite enduring by playing to humanity’s most obvious emotion: greed. It’s a primal system, and whether that’s right morally is something for each to decide for themselves.

(Personally, I don’t give a fuck, because we’re all just shaved monkeys fighting over pieces of the ground, #MJK, and to pretend to be “better” than we are is delusional. That being said, I don’t begrudge you or anyone else for your socialist beliefs, frankly I think a multitude of cultures and beliefs is what makes this world cool, and is why one system [aka capitalism] may actually not work for every community.)

TL;dr, my views on humanity are as follows
View attachment 16008
I just dropped out of the debate, just not worth my time getting worked up about it.

Humanity is fucked and our innocence is gone.
 
Reminder that Commielettes are forever BLOWN THE FUCK OUT and will never recover. Next time some socialist shitbird comes in asking why, just point at the CHAZ and laugh. let this topic remain as testament to that.
 
God I can't wait until a large rock from space kills us all. Maybe next go around economic systems won't be so important but I won't hold my breath. Mostly because I will be dead.
 
If we throw a dolphin into a pool of well established and networked sharks and the dolphin is killed does that mean it was weak and/or stupid?
Should it die?
Did it deserve to?
What if it took a long time for the sharks to collectively kill it?
What if when the sharks are trying to kill the dolphin it starts getting weak, or makes mistakes and becomes militant?
Was that a flaw inherent in the dolphin that it should die for?
Should we kill any dolphin we find in our pool?
Should we kill our own if they become a dolphin?
What if just a little bit?

Let's say a shark grows a dolphin fin.

Is that okay?
Should we eat it?
The fin, or the whole thing?

https://www.newslaundry.com/2018/02/27/dolphins-and-their-anarchist-communist-agenda
https://www.military.com/off-duty/iran-may-have-fleet-communist-killer-dolphins.html
 
Back
Top