If someone renames it, removes the story and adds a new one, it'll be a good game.
I think that's the point?If someone renames it, removes the story and adds a new one, it'll be a good game.
That's like saying "if someone takes Fallout 3's graphics and makes something totally different with it, then it will be a good game."
And it'll be called Fallout: New Vegas.That's like saying "if someone takes Fallout 3's graphics and makes something totally different with it, then it will be a good game."
And it'll be called Fallout: New Vegas.That's like saying "if someone takes Fallout 3's graphics and makes something totally different with it, then it will be a good game."
Personally, the F-80 Shooting Stars on a carrier deck in 2077 made me cuss up a storm, hahah.
Not only did they fail to tweak any number of existing 50's and 60's designs that could have easily become Fallout-esque (F-107, Thunderscreech, X-13, 14, 19, etc.) but they directly copied an aircraft part for part, and at that a 1940's jet, with guns, that was land-based, and stuck it on a carrier. It reeked far more of laziness than being amusing, and as a military history buff who got a kick out of seeing what happened to the military post-Great War, it really soured my grapes.Personally, the F-80 Shooting Stars on a carrier deck in 2077 made me cuss up a storm, hahah.
Yep. I was expecting a F9F, something naval. Hell, a Sabre would do fine. What's a F-80 doing in 2077? It's the first USA Combat Jet ffs! (sort of)
*All* Bethesda games should be criticized.all games developed by beth after oblivion should be criticiesd.