D
Deleted member 53669
Guest
Cow is the blandest of the meats.
Because they are bred to be bland animals.
Because they are bred to be bland animals.
A friend of mine actually angrily suggested to make an account here, and make a huge deal about what stuck up asses everybody is about FO3, and really show you all.
The main reason I talked him out of it, was that it would somehow, sooner or later, become evident he and me were associated, and I didn't want no drama :0 the 2nd is obviously that it would SOOO not be a new thing, and he was so remarkably convinced it would be revolutionary, and RIGHT in you-alls faces
Which is generally the kind of attitude Fallout 3 fanboys bring to this site. It has been discussed to death, some here don't like the game, some do, who really gives a shit? The reputation NMA has gotten is well deserved. I don't think most F3 fans who come to this site to tell us off really understand a lot of complaints directed at the game. For the record, I don't give a fuck if it is turn-based or not. That ship has sailed. Anyone still lamenting the fact that Fallout is no longer isometric and turn-based, should probably play a different series(Wasteland 2 lulz), or quit whining about it to save us all the heartache.
Fallout 3 was not the game we hoped it would be, but it did revive the series. Frankly I'm sick of hearing about how awful the game was. In retrospect it isn't AS bad as some make it out to be, additionally many of the people complaining about Fallout 3, complained about Fallout 2, so their opinion is null and void. Some people can't be pleased no matter what you do.
If you hate every game in the series except the original then you are extremely hard to please and I'll go the extra mile and say you aren't a true Fallout fan. BAM! I went there. The reason Fallout 3 is even playable and still talked about is due to the active mod scene. Without that the game would already be forgotten. Despite all of that I still enjoyed Fallout 3 for what it was - a post apocalyptic hiking simulator/RPG-lite.
I find it amazing that those who liked Fallout 3, but don't like New Vegas, can't understand why some die-hard Fallout fans like New Vegas better. It may simply be they like the color green instead of orange...oh and RPG's with no C&C.
All of that being said most of this could be discussed in the gaming forum so I'll quickly divert to another topic like...
The feds thinking about reclassifying marijuana to Schedule 2 instead of 1. Sure, it might be killed before it ever gets a chance, but at least they are trying. Medical marijuana users shouldn't have to be afraid of the fucking feds busting down their door, so this is progress in my book.
What? Cow is awesome, if you prepare it properly.
.
It really does not matter whether or not it resurrected the series because we are left with only one game that comes even remotely close to first two games. Not to mention the game could have been made by Troika, if Bethesda did not win the bid.Fallout 3 was not the game we hoped it would be, but it did revive the series.
And I am sick of people treating the game like it is Half-Life 2. And that is completely subjective, I think Fallout 3 is even worse than people make it out to be. People "complained" about Fallout 2 because it did not capture the same atmosphere as its predecessor, too many moronic pop cultures references, no way to finish the game without killing anyone, most of all, it was rushed. People complained about Fallout 3 because its story was linear, terrible, and nonsensical, the quests were forgettable and not fun to play, almost every character in the entire game had an IQ less than 10 (makeshift built towns near pre-war towns that could still be settlements ), hilarious bad dialogue and forced voice-acting, and no C&C, which is the most essential part of Role-Playing. So no, their opinions are not null and void because each game had different cons.Frankly I'm sick of hearing about how awful the game was. In retrospect it isn't AS bad as some make it out to be, additionally many of the people complaining about Fallout 3, complained about Fallout 2, so their opinion is null and void. Some people can't be pleased no matter what you do.
This is why the hate towards Bethesda is well deserved (sometimes). Their games are poorly designed and unplayable, so their fanbases have to fix their mistakes and improve their horrid games.The reason Fallout 3 is even playable and still talked about is due to the active mod scene. Without that the game would already be forgotten. Despite all of that I still enjoyed Fallout 3 for what it was - a post apocalyptic hiking simulator/RPG-lite.
Dunno about that. I just recently played Fallout 3 again, my second run after quite a few years. And it was utterly terrible. I really wanted to give it another chance, I really did. The landscape looks fantastic and some of the designs were absolutely spot on. But the writing, the pacing and the gameplay in general. And, O Lord, the bugs. The crashes. Even after fixing the multicore-issue it still CTD'd quite frequently.In retrospect it isn't AS bad as some make it out to be, additionally many of the people complaining about Fallout 3, complained about Fallout 2, so their opinion is null and void.
I used to whine about this myself, but looking at it now, it's actually quite pathetic to blame BGS for that. From BGS it was basically Emil P. who decided to get the Fallout franchise, then the soulless lawyers, businessmen and the rest got to work, simply looked at how much other people offered and decided to outbid them all, then greedy Herve Caen saw the dollar signs and jumped on the offer. I don't think Todd Howard, Emil P., and Pete Hines were sitting and plotting how to bring about the downfall of the Fallout franchise and laughing at Troika "hahaha poor losers, bet you wish you had some of our jew gold."Not to mention the game could have been made by Troika, if Bethesda did not win the bid.
There was choice and consequence, but it was merely cosmetics, nothing game-changing, so yeah. This attitude from BGS won't change, in fact, it will only get worse. Fallout 4 will be an impossible-to-die game, SPECIAL and the very few skills that they won't cut will have no meaning whatsoever. I wouldn't be surprised if they even went as far as cutting the old HP system and introduced to CoD style red vision that you snap out of in a few seconds. I only hope that the writers of BGS will actually start taking their jobs seriously. It seems they are getting worse, and the horrifyingly retarded voice acting certainly doesn't help make the dialogue bearable.and no C&C
I used to whine about this myself, but looking at it now, it's actually quite pathetic to blame BGS for that. From BGS it was basically Emil P. who decided to get the Fallout franchise, then the soulless lawyers, businessmen and the rest got to work, simply looked at how much other people offered and decided to outbid them all, then greedy Herve Caen saw the dollar signs and jumped on the offer. I don't think Todd Howard, Emil P., and Pete Hines were sitting and plotting how to bring about the downfall of the Fallout franchise and laughing at Troika "hahaha poor losers, bet you wish you had some of our jew gold."Not to mention the game could have been made by Troika, if Bethesda did not win the bid.
There was choice and consequence, but it was merely cosmetics, nothing game-changing, so yeah. This attitude from BGS won't change, in fact, it will only get worse. Fallout 4 will be an impossible-to-die game, SPECIAL and the very few skills that they won't cut will have no meaning whatsoever. I wouldn't be surprised if they even went as far as cutting the old HP system and introduced to CoD style red vision that you snap out of in a few seconds. I only hope that the writers of BGS will actually start taking their jobs seriously. It seems they are getting worse, and the horrifyingly retarded voice acting certainly doesn't help make the dialogue bearable.and no C&C
While you are right, we have to be fair and say that there really was no other way than to go up after Oblivion. I don't even want to imagine what a worse RPG than Oblivion might be like. Watching paint dry as doter in some retirement home might be more enjoyable. No clue. Skyrim has its strength, sadly it has still to much of Oblivion inside. For example, the writing still sucks big time, the game feels very copy-and-paste and particularly the "epic" quests are anything but not epic. 15 people attacking a town with 20 citizens ... and it's called civil war that might bring the empire to it's knees. Wtf Bethesda. Seriously.Dunno about that, either. Skyrim, compared to Oblivion, was quite an improvement when it came to gameplay.