MutantScalper
Dogmeat
Is that mutually exclusive?
Well at least it doesn't excuse what he did.
Is that mutually exclusive?
Of course not. It just explains a part of it.Well at least it doesn't excuse what he did.
Of course not. It just explains a part of it.
What part of "it just explains a part of it" didn't you understand? Of course it was terrorism, and the guy was a terrorist. Part of why he became a terrorist was because he was (apparently) not mentally healthy, likely a paranoid schizophrenic. Doesn't make him less of a terrorist, just explains part of how he got there."The massacre was called an act of terrorism by the German minister of Internal Affairs.[4]"
I think I'll go with the official view on this matter.
While Germanys Nazi past should rightly not be forgotten, is it really right to constantly beat Germans with the guilt stick though
Seriously now? - see image.It's too late for compromises. The AfD and every single one of their positions is now defined as inhumane, disgusting, and irredeemably evil. Not that most of them aren't, but the intensity at which the "old" parties now work against the AfD basically turned the political landscape into two blocks, AfD and non-AfD. Any slight movement toward the AfD is immediately seen as a concession to the AfD by the far left hardliners, and is met with the same reactions as hardcore Neonazis would be.
I don't understand how politicians believe browbeating people will get them to vote for them, if they even tried to assuage these people just a bit they'd find it infinitely more beneficial to their plans than just attempting to alienate them for voicing their grievances, but I'm just a layman so who am I to question the galaxy-brained politicians at work.It won't help anyone. AfD votes don't come from a thinly veiled racism in >20% of the population, just waiting to strap on the jackboots again to beat on brown people. It comes from a frustration with stagnant politics that feels that literally everyone is appreciated more by the government than them.
No, I am sorry. You lost me there. I've shown you the quotes. They are not the exception in this party. They are the norm. There can be no compromise with a party that openly calls someone like the fascist Höcke the "center" of the Party. Which downplays and sometimes denies the Holocaust. Which is openly racist and xenophobic. What would compromise with the AfD look like in parliaments? Ask your self this. Hass, I urge you to look deeper in to the AfD, their rhetoric, their members and what their actual target is. They are not aiming at doing politics they are not looking at compromises and being an actual part of politics. Yes not 100% of the AfD politicians are neonazis and fascists or even extreme right wingers. But they are ALL(!) complicit. They tolerate the neonazis and extreme right wingers in their party. And this is not good. This is not the same kind of party like in 2015. We have to force those people to make a decision and a stand to say, I can not stay in a party that acts like that anymore. You can be either a democrat or for the AfD. But not both. Many AfDlers who left their party have done this. And many of them said they did it because the extreme right wing has taken over the AfD and they saw no way in fight it.*sigh*
"Compromise" doesn't mean "concession"
I say bullshit. The point is that you do not have to give everyone a platform to spread their lies and missinformation. Johnes openly attacked victims of school shootings, calling them crisis actors and even getting them in to trouble because people attacked them and harrassed them.It was like Alex Jones here in the states.
Alex Jones has ALWAYS been saying shadow conspiracies want to shut him up. When Facebook or Youtube censored him, they literally played into his hands.