Asbestos Religion Thread

They think religion is good for instilling morality and a sense of purpose (and it is for a lot of people) My parents never coerced me into anything, hell when I went into my high school emo phase that is perfectly normal for growing young ladies They didn't seem to be all that bothered by it until I started being a jerk about what they believed in.

Sure religious people can cause problems (no blood transfusion stuff) but they are so small a minority they probably would just be crazy in another way if there was no religion.
 
Religion is as religion does.

The key is not relying on religion in order to formulate your arguments, because your religion, whatever it is, is unprovable. "The *your sacred text here* says x, therefore y," is faith, not logic. You have every right to believe it or not, but you have no right to force other people to live by it. To do so makes you an anti-humanist barbarian and a bad person.

Any religion that has to force people to follow its dictates can't be a very good form of belief, morally or otherwise. Enforced adherence does nothing to make people better; it merely obscures the distinction between the pious and the impious.

Ultimately Human Nature is the problem, not religion; religion and its oppressions are symptoms, not causes. Unenlightened humans always band into groups behind some symbol to try to force their beliefs on others -- Marxists, for example. Any zealous, atheistic Marxist who manages to get control of a country immediately starts oppressing the heretics and infidels. It's not a coincidence.

Personally I'm skeptical of any religion that a) began in a desert, a climate that seems to play tricks on the mind, b) offers some posthumous reward for obedience, which strikes me as the worship of death rather than life, or c) insists on the superiority of faith over reason, which is a denial of philosophy and science.

Hey, I just ranted about religion! I'm unique and special!
:P
 
Tagaziel said:
Personal faith is horrible when it directly affects other people eg. "I'm Christian, so let's baptise my children and indoctrinate them from the start into Christianity, fuck yeah personal freedoms" or "blood transfusion is bad, don't save my children".
Yes. It is horrible when it does all these things.
That is no reason to dismiss any kind of personal faith as dangerous and stupid on principle.
Also, my problem with this is less the declaration itself (with which I actually agree) but more the way it is used in debates and discussions by some people.
It is insulting to frequently rile on about how stupid their personal beliefs are. Simple as that.
 
Yeah, there's something about being an atheist that seems to turn people into a-holes. As a group they have a definite PR problem.

I grew up Lutheran, and I had a pastor who was a great guy. He was a 6-foot-9 giant but he was super nice, never condemned any other religion, and his daughters were also super nice and successful. Not sure what there is to complain about there.

Of course, religions are also chock-full or charlatans and exploiters, but that's the world, isn't it?

I myself have a grimmer view even than atheists, I think. Assuming there is a god of some sort I think he's at best indifferent to humans and at worst (and quite possibly) openly hostile. What kind of being would create weaker beings and then torture them for eternity if they don't constantly suck up to him and follow strictures that contradict the fundamental nature he gave them, all without giving them the slightest shred of tangible evidence that he exists?
 
UniversalWolf said:
openly hostile. What kind of being would create weaker beings and then torture them for eternity if they don't constantly suck up to him and follow strictures that contradict the fundamental nature he gave them, all without giving them the slightest shred of tangible evidence that he exists?

But if Allah hated us why would he not just kill us outright.

I asked my Imam over this, he said that thought came over him when he was in Palestine. But eventually he came to the conclusion that either God likes us or he doesn't notice our existence at all
 
So, god is a lazy asshole? Johnen Vasquez was right, man.

JTHM%20god.jpg
 
Sabirah said:
.. eventually he came to the conclusion that either God likes us or he doesn't notice our existence at all
Yup, sometimes it looks exactly like that.

[spoiler:d2d6565205]
34no8s4.jpg
[/spoiler:d2d6565205]
Also, there is an old Czech song written by J. Nohavica, with a freely translated sentence: "God is a blinded driver, sitting behind the wheel."
 
Sabirah said:
But if Allah hated us why would he not just kill us outright.

Because, I'm sorry to have to tell you Sabirah - Allah doesn't exist. Neither do any of the other invisible spirits people have created throughout the millennia to overcome their fear of death. :roll:
 
.Pixote. said:
Sabirah said:
But if Allah hated us why would he not just kill us outright.

Because, I'm sorry to have to tell you Sabirah - Allah doesn't exist. Neither do any of the other invisible spirits people have created throughout the millennia to overcome their fear of death. :roll:

According to you.


I do not pretend to know the secrets of the universe, But I'm pretty sure there is a God based on how I see the world and the laws of physics that govern it.
 
.Pixote. said:
Sabirah said:
But if Allah hated us why would he not just kill us outright.

Because, I'm sorry to have to tell you Sabirah - Allah doesn't exist. Neither do any of the other invisible spirits people have created throughout the millennia to overcome their fear of death. :roll:

This is why Religion threads fail. Someone always comes in and talks shit about people who actually believe in something. To be fair NMA is not the best place to talk about Religion though. I don't follow any one Religion, but I don't go around telling people their God's don't exist. It's not like you are telling them something a million other people haven't said.
 
UniversalWolf said:
What kind of being would create weaker beings and then torture them for eternity if they don't constantly suck up to him and follow strictures that contradict the fundamental nature he gave them, all without giving them the slightest shred of tangible evidence that he exists?

I am not exactly responding to what you said but more to the idea that a lot of people bring up: why God would allow suffering, weakness and diseases. It seems that it's related a bit.

Some religious people view life as a test. If humans were simply born into Heaven, it would either be just like Earth, with all its' man-made problems; or for the lasting utopia to exist, humans would have to completely lack individuality and free will, making them something else entirely. Thus, some believe that freedom of choice is the central point of our existence, as we are.

We live in a very organic world, in which we constantly make choices, even if they are to allow various forces (trends, ads, etc.) to influence our ultimate decisions. These choices and decisions have far-reaching consequences. If a person suffers, it's usually due to something he/she or someone else did. If a person is sick or weak, it probably has something to do with the environment or the personal lifestyle or that of his/her parents. We ourselves help or hurt uh... ourselves and each other.

Even natural disasters are something that we need to address and prepare for because they obviously aren't magic but are processes that brew over time and appear due to existing elements, including human elements. Instead, some blame God for making the bad stuff happen. Well, an alternative view is to say that we did something to cause it or we could have learned about the way things worked and we could have taken measures to prepare. As Quran, for example, says: "man shall have nothing but what he strives for" (53:39, same idea in different translations). Basically, Earth is one big boiling pot of cause and effect entrusted to us from 'above' to see what we can do with it, given the freedom.

The question is then why does God not constantly interfere and stop all these bad things or why did He not create a world where such things could not occur. After all, it is a world designed and ultimately governed by Him. In such a case though, some believe that this life would fail to be an adequate test. Difficulties would not arise and it's in hard times when people really show their colors, don't they?

One may think that necessitating difficulties that cause suffering is evil but in some philosophies, it is up to an individual whether to suffer. A person can hate his life for not having an iPhone and someone else can lose a fucking face to a crazy chimp and still find enjoyment in life. In some religions, God's mercy is helping one achieve that peaceful state of mind, and His intervention is not to magically lift obstacles from one's path but to guide the person toward the best way around them. Basically, when we pray for help, we really pray asking for that inner guidance that will be the force influencing our ultimate choices in a manner that could cause the most beneficial reactions for us in this world.

This may make no sense to you but it is one way to look at things for some. Overall, I find that theism makes somewhat more sense and can have a place in the modern world, when we think of it a little more logically and scientifically, and avoid using words and imagery that they used centuries ago to explain things that are not explainable to an average human being, possibly ever. But I'm rambling before bedtime. Don't judge too harshly at this hour.
 
Sabirah said:
UniversalWolf said:
openly hostile. What kind of being would create weaker beings and then torture them for eternity if they don't constantly suck up to him and follow strictures that contradict the fundamental nature he gave them, all without giving them the slightest shred of tangible evidence that he exists?

But if Allah hated us why would he not just kill us outright.

What would be the fun in that, huh? :|

It may very well be that existance is just one gigangatic 'troll' on us.

maximaz said:
(...)why God would allow suffering, weakness and diseases. It seems that it's related a bit.

Some religious people view life as a test (...)

Ah yes, the 'i torture you to test you' and 'free will' arguments... meaning, existence is an experiment which we the lab rats are not meant to understand otherwise the test results would be compromised, and as for free will, it has a very nice ring to it sometimes but people can only will and choose what their personal 'make-up' allows them to even see, as well as the circumstances at the critical moment... the array of possibilities for 'choice' a person encounters at life can be very limited then.
 
maximaz said:
... free will...



Ah, free will, one of the greatest illusions ever conceived. Considering every action is just a logical reaction to another action, so are the impulses we call "free will". Every thought you ever had was just a consequence caused by a certain combination of millions of other causes/consequences, from big things like your brain and nerve structure to incredibly microscopical details like the difference between you eating 100 grams of sugar at a certain day 5 years ago and you eating 200 grams of sugar that day.

It is all just a perfectly logical cause-and-effect dictated by billions and billions of factors.
 
TorontRayne said:
.Pixote. said:
Sabirah said:
But if Allah hated us why would he not just kill us outright.

Because, I'm sorry to have to tell you Sabirah - Allah doesn't exist. Neither do any of the other invisible spirits people have created throughout the millennia to overcome their fear of death. :roll:

This is why Religion threads fail. Someone always comes in and talks shit about people who actually believe in something. To be fair NMA is not the best place to talk about Religion though. I don't follow any one Religion, but I don't go around telling people their God's don't exist. It's not like you are telling them something a million other people haven't said.

This. :clap:

Also: I believe in Zeus. I don't even understand why others stopped believing in Him. Why is that? Is that because someone had proof that Zeus didn't exist, proof I don't even know about?
 
It may very well be that existance is just one gigangatic 'troll' on us.

Bingo. The arrogance of our species amuses me no end; we create deities and claim them omnipotent, yet we feel obliged to personify them and assume they give a toss about what we are up to. I'd imagine we are either entirely beneath their notice or simply there to amuse them, along with an infinite number of other 'intelligent' life forms scattered throughout the various universes.

there is a free will. Maybe its much smaller then people think. But it is definitely there.

The idea of free will is like the concept of chance. It doesn't really exist, but in most scenarios we don't have the capacity of extrapolation for this to be apparent. Therefore for most intents and purposes, it's easier to assume it does exist.


Also: I believe in Zeus. I don't even understand why others stopped believing in Him. Why is that? Is that because someone had proof that Zeus didn't exist, proof I don't even know about?

Good question. As I've said before, I worship Thor and Odin. Odin is more or less the Norse version of Zeus I guess.
 
Yoshi525 said:
The idea of free will is like the concept of chance. It doesn't really exist, but in most scenarios we don't have the capacity of extrapolation for this to be apparent. Therefore for most intents and purposes, it's easier to assume it does exist.


You are in the middle of a horrific fire. You hear a scream coming from the room where your wife was. You hear another from your best friends apartment down the hall. You have time to save only one of them, who is it?

Free will does exist. It and art are what separates us from the animals
 
Sabirah said:
Yoshi525 said:
The idea of free will is like the concept of chance. It doesn't really exist, but in most scenarios we don't have the capacity of extrapolation for this to be apparent. Therefore for most intents and purposes, it's easier to assume it does exist.


You are in the middle of a horrific fire. You hear a scream coming from the room where your wife was. You hear another from your best friends apartment down the hall. You have time to save only one of them, who is it?

Free will does exist. It and art are what separates us from the animals
Free will is an illusion, and to be fair, there is no real difference between illusion and anything else.
The thing is that your consciousness is a product of your past and present. Each neuron fires because of previously fired neurons, forming your thoughts and your mind.
Thus each state of your brain (essentially each thought) is a propagation of previous states under the influence of your surroundings.
So 'free will' is merely an illusion. You 'decide' to do something, but it's not that something above physical reality decides, something not bound by causality. You decide in a way because that's the result of uncountable propagations of states of your brain.
But that doesn't mean anything, actually.
You can't 'decide against your past', so to speak, because actively doing so is still reacting to your past and thus simple propagation of brainstates.
 
Back
Top