Joelzania said:Why do people really care about having a female lead role in a GTA game, may I ask? It seems like a real non-issue to me.
Walpknut said:It is such a non issue Idon't see why you are rguing about it, like Surf Solar said, Having token characters just for PCness sake is pretty dumb. If they don't intend to do it with a female lead then they have no obligation to do it.
34thcell said:Variety; if you've got three protagonists then you might as well have one woman. I'd be surprised if the DLC didn't have any female leads.
Tagaziel said:Joelzania said:Why do people really care about having a female lead role in a GTA game, may I ask? It seems like a real non-issue to me.
Walpknut said:It is such a non issue Idon't see why you are rguing about it, like Surf Solar said, Having token characters just for PCness sake is pretty dumb. If they don't intend to do it with a female lead then they have no obligation to do it.
God forbid having variety in a game. Or a new protagonist, instead of Hardened Male Badass #11, #12 and #13.
As for the token part, how about, um, not making them token characters?
Walpknut said:How about just not worrying about the gender of the character and instead just making a character they feel fits with whatever they are writing?
Tagaziel said:God forbid having variety in a game. Or a new protagonist, instead of Hardened Male Badass #11, #12 and #13.
Joelzania said:There's variety and then there's caring what skin your character goes about in killing things. Variety to me would mean more gameplay variety, not characters. In fact, the greatest variety to me would me a shit ton of radio stations and adverts. The best part of GTA is listening to the adverts.
Brother None said:Joelzania said:There's variety and then there's caring what skin your character goes about in killing things. Variety to me would mean more gameplay variety, not characters. In fact, the greatest variety to me would me a shit ton of radio stations and adverts. The best part of GTA is listening to the adverts.
That's a but of a reductionist attitude, for a series that has for the last handful of releases been strongly story-driven. The personality of the main character matters a ton, and he/she has to be well-written and voice acted. Story is massively important to these titles, it was everything to GTA IV. Maybe you just skip through the cutscenes, but not all of us do, so it's not just "skin", it's part of the experience.
Sander said:These are all male tough guys in general, but they're also pretty different in personality. They're not just maniacal serial killers. In fact, none of them are that. They all have some reasons and motivations, and none of them just go on random killing sprees.
Sander said:You could also take a lot of different angles. The hood rat who's just a soldier in a gang (see Snoop on The Wire, for instance). The female head of the family, manipulating everyone to keep the strings (a stereotype present in almost every crime movie). The girlfriend of a low-level killed or jailed gangster who takes over his activities. The rich girl who's rebelling against her upbringing. A former soldier forced into crime to take care of herself (or her family). Or just a woman who's pretty good at being a criminal.
There are tons of angles you can explore here, and really, there's no good reason not to try this out some time.
Except, of course, business reasons.
It's all in the execution. Quite frankly, you're nitpicking and ridiculing stereotypes (which, because they're stereotypes, are easily ridiculed). You can do the same for the stereotypes in existing GTA games. In fact, let's do that.TheGM said:You named a bunch of examples and none of them sound fun.
No, they're very different things. In fact, you were complaining that Rockstar was exploiting a demographic for profit (which duh, they're a company). This complaint reflects not Rockstar, but basically the entire gaming industry, which seems completely incapable of breaking free of a male-dominated paradigm. Except when they produce sex objects as main characters, because that's so much better.SnapSlav said:Complaining right now about GTA's lack of a female lead is just as silly as my complaints about "adding in black people". It's ill-founded, and pretentious.
Don't put up un-fun stereotypes and I won't destroy them.Sander said:It's all in the execution. Quite frankly, you're nitpicking and ridiculing stereotypes (which, because they're stereotypes, are easily ridiculed). You can do the same for the stereotypes in existing GTA games. In fact, let's do that.TheGM said:You named a bunch of examples and none of them sound fun.
You can't touch Tommy, even when you are trying to do what I did without the awesome. y-y-you can't do it. he is Scarface without Al Pacino's terrible acting(Yelling =/= acting) stincking up the joint. Also if you are gonna do the thing I did can you at least get the stuff about the characters right? Helps with the reading experience.Tommy: Oh seriously, just released from prison again? And you start out at the bottom? Yeah fuck that.
And, of course, there's no reason why GTA needs to stick to 'established' models, either. Hell, they even had a strong female character who could function as a main character in the form of Elizabeta Torres.