Top Ten Things That Should Be Illegal but Somehow Aren't

I wish people would realize that when it comes to >cencorship< and >free speech< what the constitution says is that the government has no right to censorship or limit your free speech. But a privately owned media company, let us say Youtube or Fox News? They have every right to decide what they want to air and what not. It doesn't mean that we always like their practise. But if they decide they don't want some schlong waving around on their platform or kidz getting murdered, or someone saying nasty words like nigger? Than that is their prerogative. We can have public discussions about it yes, but we can not tell MSNBC what they should say or show and what not.

So in other words the government has no right to make you stop from let us say opening your own news paper or starting your own broad cast. But the government has no right to tell people what they are supposed to broadcoast there. You can't really force people to not cencor themself if you so will.
 
Last edited:
I wish people would realize that when it comes to >cencorship< and >free speech< what the constitution says is that the government has no right to censorship or limit your free speech. But a privately owned media company, let us say Youtube or Fox News? They have every right to decide what they want to air and what not. It doesn't mean that we always like their practise. But if they decide they don't want some schlong waving around on their platform or kidz getting murdered, or someone saying nasty words like nigger? Than that is their prerogative. We can have public discussions about it yes, but we can not tell MSNBC what they should say or show and what not.

So in other words the government has no right to make you stop from let us say opening your own news paper or starting your own broad cast. But the government has no right to tell people what they are supposed to broadcoast there. You can't really force people to not cencor themself if you so will.

Youtube and Fox are slaves to their advertisers like most media companies. The problem people have with censorship on the youtube front is that the tools they use to take down videos can be easily abused. However on censorship most people are referring to social media sites like Twitter or Facebook. These companies have taken money from the government to build these sites and being classified as platforms should mean that they have no responsibility for what's posted on the site. However they act more like publishers editing, hiding, and deleting things they don't like. They only say they are platforms so that they are protected legally.

Also the whole "Dude just make your own site, internet provider, bank, etc." isn't a good argument because their are many examples of people doing this and having their web hosts shut them down, banks decline to work with them, and master card blacklisting them. You can't make your own shit because if the big dogs don't like the shit you're pulling and then you end up like Andrew Anglin setting up a site in any country who will host him, and dodging vice journalists and shit.
 
Youtube and Fox are slaves to their advertisers like most media companies. The problem people have with censorship on the youtube front is that the tools they use to take down videos can be easily abused.
It's still not >cencorship< though. It's companies making use of their rights. Is it always fair? Is it always good? No. Don't assume that I am on their side with all what they do. I am very crititical about Youtube and particularly Facebook. Which is also something that's currecntly getting more attention by the authorities when you consider that some of the big tech companies like Google, Facebook and Amazon had to be present in a hearing. They have a monopoly on the market right now and it could happen at some point that they will be split up like Standard Oil once. But that's a whole different discussion.

Simply screaming on top of your lungs cencorship! Makes you look kinda foolish in my opinion. Not only because it's factually wrong but it also doesn't help in resolving the issue.

These companies have taken money from the government to build these sites and being classified as platforms should mean that they have no responsibility for what's posted on the site. However they act more like publishers editing, hiding, and deleting things they don't like. They only say they are platforms so that they are protected legally.
.
Again I criticise their practise. But still it's not cencorship. It just means that those companies have very huge leverage and a very strong position due to their status and size. It sure sucks. But it's not cencorship.

What you can see much more these days with media companies is manipulation. And that should be a much bigger concern to us. Because it is not only more difficult to recognize it's also much harder to combat by regulations.

Also the whole "Dude just make your own site, internet provider, bank, etc." isn't a good argument because their are many examples of people doing this and having their web hosts shut them down, banks decline to work with them, and master card blacklisting them.

Which isn't what I said. Please read it again, carefully! The point was to show what actuall cencorship looks like. For example a Gestapo run by the government busting your door open and throwing you in a camp for opening a news paper that criticises the authorities. That's cencorship.

Your content being flagged on youtube or demonetised because it violates their user terms or because someone else found it offensive? Is not cencorship. It might still be a big problem though. But that is a different discussion. You will find many people in the government actually agreeing with your position that it is a problem. But how to fix it isn't that easy answered because at the end of the day those companies do have rights. What ever if we like it or not.

But as long as this issue isn't solved there are ways in how you can work around some issues. For example if you're a content creator try to diversify. Don't just show your stuff on youtube. There are alternatives out there.

I know it's not ideal but that's all you can do at the moment. Oh and of course voice your opinion about it. The more people show their concerns and dislike the larger will the pressure be on those companies to change something.
 
Last edited:
I'll add a few this is fun:

Crni's level of the command of the english language.

People driving by themselves with facemasks on.
 
Why do we deserve such honor? And I am glad you masturbate more to posts now.

Oh wait ... this is not the Order ... you pervert.
 
is it wrong that me and my family almost exclusively eat crunchy at this point? We buy peter pan lol.
Holy shit not only is it bad enough that you're watching nasty ass crunchy bitch butter but PETER PAN? THAT OILY ABOMINABLE TRASH GTFO. GET AWAY FROM ME I SWEAR TO GOD
 
Holy shit not only is it bad enough that you're watching nasty ass crunchy bitch butter but PETER PAN? THAT OILY ABOMINABLE TRASH GTFO. GET AWAY FROM ME I SWEAR TO GOD
81ryQwNmJIL._SL1500_.jpg

MMMMMMMM.
 
Last edited:
Peter Pan Peanut Butter right? RIGHT?
eat peter pan.png


Found a bunch of neat things I'd like to post looking for pics to use to create that abomination that I want to share on here. Don't wanna spam though.
sdgfhjj.png


Also found a bunch of NSFW stuff which I can't post here. Will post on Discord's NSFW channel.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top